Rey.BEng 21st September 2026, tired, this has been a long journey, eh
I say units of gravity are misrepresented because of continuous second blunder.
It has units of power Nm/s, the Watt (lightbulb moment)
https://x.com/PCosmologist/status/2101965533771862414
Grok says, timely in the right place: the metric they named is power per wall area. That is a surface spending energy. Your missing letter is the same leftover, dressed as a Watt.
SI Watt (do not mix desks)
W = J/s = N m / s
Ace did not have a home for N m / s.
Unity was
(m/s) . N^ . s(2) = k . g . m *s(4)
The Watt is the assembled face of that string with s(2) cancelled into a flow:
N^ m / s
PowerWall-area metric is Power per m(2) — XII Face reading V–VI. Consumed wall = dashed IV if you treat Strength as infinite and never replace the skin. NMSI’s point: change the reaction and the metric changes. Your point: name the unit before you name the reactor.
Conjecture on g
Do not give g the σ line. σ m/s² stays king on I.
g stays in the package k.g.s(2).
What you wrote is a reading, not a replacement:g ~ ^N (m) / s*
Three marks, one triangle:
^ tick assembled 10a N^
N rest the bar
spark exploded 10b *N
Tick and spark are interchangeable as the same journey, not as the same seat.
10a assembled N^10b exploded *Njoint π_E XI.λ no centroidTriangle is V–VI–I: N^ / \ (m/s) — *s(4)
That is 3-phase as occupancy, not as 120° AC. Label the parts. Do not add a thirteenth station.GravityCcl already: measured g is State-B phase. This page only letters the missing Power so the derivation does not steal σ’s units.σ m/s² halo, Ig package, with k and s(2)W N^ m / s Power*s(4) Spark I and XLiking the joint split: yes. Liking g owning m/s²: no. Liking Power as the named /s on N m: yes.assembled N^exploded *NWatt N^ m / swall Power / m(2)`
ace-consultancy.uk 