Below are the highlights from a sequence of emails which began after I discovered that unreferenced PCA document is the corruption of the law. A corrupt law is no law at all, but the system is completely invested in not exposing this point, because the moment it is exposed, the system collapses.
| To Lisa Richards PC 3462, of the South Wales Police professional Standards Department Tue, 13 Feb, 11:24 cc to Austin, alex.daviesjones.mp, Mick, corbynj, bishop.llandaffea, ZaneNdlovu, South, PSD, bcc: Michael (To all addressed parties – I have CC to my constitutional legal representatives for their information as they have also been included in all previous correspondence, to Jeremy Corbyn, a politician who is invested in Peace, to the Bishop of Llandaff, my local representative of my Church, to the South African Minister of Justice, and to the lead barrister on the raising of the Genocide case against Israel with ICJ, and there is also a BCC to my personal legal representative) |
PC Richards (Lisa, for future reference, I consider use of first names is inappropriate between members of the public and its police service officers)
Thanks you for your email response (included below as first email in this trail).
You have identified some of the factors in your email, copied and replied to below, but you have missed the wider implications of my complaint:
RESPONSE
I have a very deep concern that the UK Law itself is corrupt. and that as a man of deep Christian Faith, my understanding of God’s Law conflicts with the Rule of Law. It is essential that I understand whether it is the South Wales Police Service that allows me to carry out an alleged assault, or whether it is UK Law. The implications on UK Government in complicity of Genocide by the State of Israel are foremost in my mind, in terms of urgency of action, and how far I am prepared to take my case.
The police failure to investigate Incident no. 718 3.1.24 (crime number 2400002908) demonstrates to me that I am able to commit assault without censure, relying only on my own morality, which is God’s Law as I understand it, effectively placing me above UK Law and de facto accepting that God’s Law is the higher power. If this is is the case, I insist that the current government is removed from power and that suspected individuals are arrested on suspicion of complicity in Genocide referencing the ruling of the ICJ (Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide in the Gaza Strip (South Africa v. Israel) Allegations of Genocide under the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Ukraine v. Russian Federation), Provisional Measures, Order of 16 March 2022, I.C.J. Reports 2022 (I), p. 222, para. 43). In the Court’s view, at least some of the acts and omissions alleged by South Africa to have been committed by Israel in Gaza appear to be capable of falling within the provisions of the Convention.
It can be demonstrated that International Law can have precedence over UK Law:
R (SG) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2015] UKSC 16. There Lord Kerr at [235]2 argued that the executive should be bound at the domestic level by human rights commitments undertaken at the international level. But even Lord Kerr recognises that his view is in conflict with “constitutional orthodoxy”.
If the ‘constitutional orthodoxy’ of UK domestic law can be demonstrated to be immoral through my complaint then the dualist approach currently cited can no longer be considered legitimate.
For example, in a speech given to the UK Supreme Court King’s College, London by Lord Mance on13th February 2017 ( chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://www.supremecourt.uk/docs/speech-170213.pdf, accessed 13/2/24) he stated that ‘the UK takes a fundamentally dualist view of international law. In other words, it sees domestic and international law as operating on different planes. International law has of course inspired the common law…. But the reception of international law into domestic law depends upon its acceptance in one of two ways: either by Parliament through legislation or by the judges through the common law’.
If parliament is acting without reference to God’s Law, as it appears to be in light of failure to investigate my alleged crime, then the International Court of Justice can be demonstrated to be the superior Authority and Judges should act accordingly through common law. Failure to so act indicates that The Courts themselves have also become corrupted in terms of the enforcement of morality.
Much has been written about the role of the Law with regards to the enforcement of Morality, for example:
https://www.counselmagazine.co.uk/articles/law-and-morality-the-eternal-debate (accessed 13/2/2024)
Sir James Munby, President of the Family Division of the High Court, giving the keynote address to the Law Society’s Family Law Annual Conference on 29 October 2013. Although his paper, entitled “Law, Morality and Religion in the Family Courts” was more widely reported on his remarks about the role of religion in our law courts (“Religion … is not the business of government or the secular courts”), much of what he said was really directed to the wider issue of morals, which can be derived from religion, but need not be. And he was careful to remind his listeners of the distinction between enforcing religious principles or the morality derived from them on the one hand, and respecting and protecting the right to hold sincere beliefs on the other
It is the stated protection of ‘the right to hold to sincere beliefs’ that have been enshrined by the current incumbent of the head of the church in England and Wales in his coronation speech (widely quoted). He promised as follows:
The Archbishop says ‘Will you to the utmost of your power maintain the Laws of God and the true profession of the Gospel…..’
The King replies All this I promise to do.
The King places his hand on the Bible and says ‘The things which I have here before promised, I will perform and keep. So help me God’
The contradiction between the king’s sworn declaration, and his acceptance of complicity by his government in actions which have been ruled at International level to fall under the convention of Genocide, and therefore contravention also of God’s Law (as discussed above) cannot be reconciled. Action must be taken, and with urgency.
My complaint against the South Wales Police therefore falls into this wider case and should be considered as part of my fight on the side of God against the UK government .
I sign myself with the reference, Acts 3; 22-23, for this reason.
Response to points raised by PC Richards
Please can you clarify what your dissatisfaction is, from what I can glean it appears to be the following Points:
1: Lack of investigation into the assault upon yourself, by the unknown male that you challenged.
2: CCTV not viewed
3: You make mention that it is your view SWP officers are corrupt, please can you explain what you mean by this and why you think that is, and if you have any supporting evidence that relates to yourself and this statement.
In terms of your initial assessment of my complaint as dissatisfaction with the service provided by South Wales Police, this can be summarised as below against your points above, with some additional issues appended:
1 You have misunderstood. To confirm, it is the police failure to investigate an incident of assault, by myself, against a person unknown, that is the cause of dissatisfaction. A crime has been committed and reported, with evidence provided. There must at the very least be a review of evidence before a decision is taken not to prosecute, or not to investigate further, and I would anticipate a formal response would be provided to any parties involved. This has not occured; the police have instead chosen just not to investigate anything at all, and also not to inform me why not.
2 This is a detail of 1 (failure to investigate). CCTV existed when the incident was initially reported. The owners of the footage stated they would provide this to me so that I could forward to police and this was promised to me on 4th January, the day after the incident. However, the footage was not provided, for reasons unknown, and police were notified in 5th and 9th January emails, and on 11th January I informed the police by voice record on 101 number that they would need to obtain the footage through their own channels.
I have no information whether this was done or not.
If it was not requested, then this evidence will now likely have been lost. Video footage would provide useful evidence for your investigation, therefore I am dissatisfied that it was not obtained by the police – see above point 1.
Emails:
(On Fri, 5 Jan 2024 at 15:17, martin reynolds <walnuttreejunction@gmail.com> wrote:
INCIDENT NUMBER 718 3/1/24[MR1]
Investigation Update
1. Update – the CCTV footage was recorded by the ‘Rockstar’ barbers/beauty salon opposite my property. I have requested the footage, and left my number in the coffee shop area, with an IOU for a coffee. I was promised the footage by Whatsapp on 4th Jan, but it has not yet arrived. I did not want to delay my requested action ( to send footage) so this email must suffice, for now.
and
Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2024 at 08:54
Subject: 2400002908 Police Corruption Investigation
To: <swp101@south-wales.police.uk>
I also stated that the CCTV footage was available (which the officer did not know) and suggested that if his was considered valuable evidence then they can request it form the owner (property opposite)
3: Confirm corruption allegations (see above commentary on God’s Law, morality and precedence of international law) At the moment I am assuming that the police’s failure to investigate is either ineptitude or incompetence, as expressed in my email to the Police Commissioner, Alun Hill, on 22nd January.
It may prove to be true that the South Wales police will be demonstrated to be inept, and therefore the allegations of corruption would be proven false. The outcome of my complaints procedure will determine which is true, or indeed, there may be another explanation. As I stated in my original email, the purpose of any investigation is to uncover the facts (in the case of the police, of any reported crime) prior to committing to any of the possible outcomes, and I am sure we will follow the same proven process in your police Standards Dept.
I do have grave concerns however about corruption of UK law itself (and therefore by extension, anyone operating under its authority) because of the evidence I have about Dr Dr Viktor Lewe, 1915, and the unreferenced tables in the PCA document, 1st issue 1942, latest 1993. That I had this evidence was revealed to my MS, MP and to South Wales Police but, other than my MS cancelling my meeting with him to discuss, I have received no feedback on the precedence of the existence of this information on UK Law. I believe that it breaches the official secrets act, because of the nuclear and atomic information it contains which contradicts Einstein’s General Relativity (also 1915), but I am happy to have the case clearly explained to me by any official authority. It is my contention that it is my revelation that I will be relying on evidence regarding Dr Lewe as my defence in court that prevents me from being prosecuted for my alleged crime.
See link to drop box (copy and paste URL) https://drive.google.com/drive/u/0/folders/1JjeZNhILW45wjXHbX4Y-LEvYx92wv2KK for associated documentary evidence – suggest first a reading of Exhibit A in the Lewe Information and Records folder to understand main details of the story.
Lewe’s paper exposes atomic secrets, but this does not excuse allowing an unreferenced document to exist within the current UK constitution. I believe that the effect of the illegally omitted citation is that UK Law is entirely corrupted. I have strong information to support my conjecture, but this could only be proven by formally linking the two documents in a legal citation with a reissue of the 1993 edition. My complaint against the police is part of my work to make this happen
The following factors are also included in the emails you already have and should be taken account of in your process:
- I am working on behalf of British Intelligence
- The UK govt is currently in contravention of International Law with allegations of complicity in Genocide, so the need to expose any potential corruption, (which could be the possible cause of actions of devastating consequence) requires urgency of action
- A citizen who can prove in a court of law that their own personal morality is higher than the current king can challenge for the Throne and Head of the Church. I state my constitutional right to make this challenge whilst reserving the right to die in the Service of Christ
- The police have so far declined to carry out a psychiatric report on myself, despite my suggestion, and invitation, to do so
General Comments on Police Process
Your general process and procedures have been identified as requiring improvement. Details are in the email trail and it may prove beneficial to police service as end-user feedback. Some are small wins which the police could easily instigate (such as offer call-back facility at first contact with 101 number, rather than waiting for ten or eleven minutes each time, to prevent wastage of public time). Indeed some of the procedure followed (such as an unbriefed officer calling at 23:15 and not even able to take a recorded statement) seem particularly thoughtless of the negative impact on members of the public who have dealings with your service.
I understand that my complaint will be reviewed by the Supervisory and allocated to an officer, who will get in contact to further the matter. Please can you advise of timescales, noting the second bullet point on urgency of action above
Regards
Reynolds BEng 2.20
Acts 3;22-23
(Confirm Mr Reynolds, as below, is appropriate in any future correspondence, thank you)
| martin reynolds | Sat, 6 Jan, 13:15 |  | |
| to professional | |||
I am raising a constitutional claim to the throne of the King of England. It may prove to be an interesting case, and you may hear about it soon.
See below email trail and link to dropbox for documented evidence.
Feidi Defensor
Reynolds BEng
———- Forwarded message ———
From: martin reynolds
Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2024 at 13:05
Subject: Fwd: 2400002908 Video Evidence update
To: Corbyn
Cc: various: FT Science Journalist, MPs, MEP, MS, ICE, PCA, UN, Embassies
(all cc who have been involved in my attempt to expose the Corruption of British Parliamentary Sovereignty by the unreferenced PCA document, see dropbox link)
Mr Corbyn – I have nominated yourself to be my Prime Minister while we go through the hand-over of power, but the first priority is Immediate action to establish Peace for Palestine and to withdraw all British Forces except for aid or peace-keeping duties.
Please take any immediate appropriate actions concerning arrest of remainder of Westminster, pending investigation (I will be taking over the Covid Enquiry, and will present all evidence there next week. Cn you arrange this? The Police have my phone number, please call me to discuss arrangements. I have requested a call from Simon Case, as head of Civil Service so that he can understand the change of loyalty and align his organisation as necessary. If you could facilitate the call that would be helpful. Note notes on urgency below. Thanks, Jeremy, in advance, for your loyalty on this matter. You have been solid, and I have seen your plight. I have your back if you have mine.
Archbishop
Please see below email trail whereby I claim my constitutional right to the Throne of the King of England, with immediate effect, in order to establish permanent ceasefire in Palestine, right a historical injustice perpetrated on the Arabs, prevent British Soldiers dying in a War on the wrong side, and to bring God back to the heart of Justice in our own promised land – The Sovereign States of Great Britain.
I summarise my case thus:
An assault has been committed in broad daylight, with witnesses, CCTV evidence, contemporaneous notes, and recorded testimony which have all been lodged with the South Wales Police by myself (crime number as shown in subject line). It is an open and shut case. I have done all the work for the police, in order to make prosecution straightforward and I insist that I am charged with the crime of which I am guilty ( I presume common assault, or assault and battery to be confirmed). I will own attempted murder in my next statement to Police, as this was momentarily my intent, but police may feel this is excessive as a formal charge. I leave it their judgement.
For a change, I find that my own deeply held Christian understanding of how God prefers me to behave actually aligns with the Laws of the current incumbent of the Crown of England, the Head of The Church in Great Britain.
I have made my peace with my God and we have agreed that if I can find healing for the subject of my attack, through helping him towards a place of real safety and support, with prospects of a future in a happy kingdom, then I am forgiven.
I believe the best way to achieve my God-given purpose is to play a full and active part in the inquiry, so that all issues, both direct and, much more importantly, indirect, can be brought to the surface. That is the point of an investigation, not the prosecution – what did we learn and how can we apply it in future.
It is essential therefore that the Police do prosecute me. Justice must be seen to be done and I must be allowed to publicly atone for my sin. Plus we might make some much-needed improvements. I see only win/win and I will accept any punishment the Court decides.
A refusal to prosecute me is an obstruction of justice, both Man’s and God’s.
Therefore my challenge to your Government is this: my morality is the Superior, prove me wrong.
A citizen who can prove in a court of law that their own personal morality is higher than the current king can challenge for the Throne.
I state my constitutional right to make this challenge in open court. And I will win, or your God loses.
Note I reserve the right to die in the Service of Christ at any moment of my choosing.
The easiest way to avoid the bloodshed is to make me king; be swift, be decisive. I know what to do.
Get me the levers of power. Now.
Call me, Feidi Defensor
Rally to your new King
Reynolds BEng 2.20
Acts 3 22 23
———- Forwarded message ———
From: martin reynolds <walnuttreejunction@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2024 at 19:04
Subject: Re: 2400002908 Video Evidence update
To: <swp101@south-wales.police.uk>
Cc: <alex.daviesjones.mp@parliament.uk>
Again, to spare time, note that prosecuting me for assault for the incident will result in V Lewe, 1915, see dropbox link, being presented as evidence, so the disclosure of atomic secrets will occur in open court, and societal behaviour impacts will be very hard to control.
Note that Clare Daly has a link to the dropbox in her inbox, to be used as evidence in Israel’s war crimes trial. Again, again, again, all I can do is encourage urgent co-operation with my really rather simple and sensible demands. No-one needs to die over this, Alex.
Speak soon
On Fri, 5 Jan 2024 at 18:36, martin reynolds <walnuttreejunction@gmail.com> wrote:
Ms Davies-Jones
I appreciate this may be an unexpected turn of events, but please, to save time, and I believe bloodshed, let me lay out your options.
A My preferred Option
1 Hand me ALL executive power immediately.
2 Request to Cabinet Secretary Simon Case to contact me on the number held by the police against the crime number
Result of transfer of Executive Power – No British Troops to fight in support of Israel. FULL STOP. Immediate ceasefire in all wars. New Management Team to be installed, GBplc & Associated Holdings, to seize and manage Crown Property on my behalf. (Note ALL PROPERTY IS CROWN PROPERTY), to be maintained under the temp. custodianship of the current guardians until the Runaround is organised. plus a great deal more but I would prefer to discuss details with Mr Case.
Urgency Notes
When Fascist Regimes fall, they barely go quietly. The trend seems to be that if they start in heinous brutal bloodshed, they end in peace, of sorts.
However, if they arise through a corrupted democratic coup, the bloodshed happens at the end. I’m thinking the Spanish Civil War, the former, and the collapse of regimes at the end of WW2, the latter
Your current set-up would definitely fall into the latter category, I would say.
If you act decisively, with swift resolution and a stout Welsh Heart, then together we could arrange transfer of power without anyone noticing.
And then we can arrest ALL MPs immediately, prior to investigation of bribery and corruption charges to start with; re Covid Inquiry findings to date.
I will make the case that perjury applies to my inquiry, retrospectively. I think this will enough to calm the masses, and that is my immediate concern, ms davies-jones. Comms are key, but only after transfer of power.
I wait for call.
or
B Reply to this email confirming that I am above the Law.
I will speak to my legal team to reclaim all taxes paid by myself, and commence a class action on behalf of all citizens, living and dead.
I will use funds to raise a superior power, and take my throne by might.
Again, there is likely to be bloodshed, but c’mon, play fair, I cannot be held responsible for that; A Man of God must accommodate man’s law in your system, but he will never compromise his morality from He who really holds the reins of power on this planet. That would be just silly, wouldn’t it.
God is all powerful, what have you got, really?
To confirm, I claim the right to die in the service of my God.
As always, you do have a choice, but in this case, I am playing both hands. Its lose/lose for the bad guys.
Lesson of lockdown – Play the hand you are dealt
I will await your call (see notes above on urgency)
Your Servant
Reynolds BEng 2.20
Acts 3 22 23
Fidei Defensor
Please ‘reply all’ in any email responses, thank you
On Fri, 5 Jan 2024 at 15:17, martin reynolds <walnuttreejunction@gmail.com> wrote:
INCIDENT NUMBER 718 3/1/24
Concerning case of assault on person unknown by:
Martin John Reynolds
7, Cardiff Road
Ffynnon Taf
CF15 7RA
at est 14:00 on Wednesday 3rd January.
(Noting here weather conditions were overcast and dry)
Dear Police Officer (Official correspondence was signed BARRY SWP, so I am unclear if this is a person or a place. If a Police Officer, I would expect number as a minimum, if a civilian, I would expect formal Christian and surname, if a place, I would expect this to made obvious, rather than allowing any doubt. Its a small thing, but it’s an easy win to help restore confidence that the Police do actually know what they are doing, and can control the tools they are given to do their job. Perhaps you could consider update to the template for clarity in future?)
Investigation Update
1. Update – the CCTV footage was recorded by the ‘Rockstar’ barbers/beauty salon opposite my property. I have requested the footage, and left my number in the coffee shop area, with an IOU for a coffee. I was promised the footage by Whatsapp on 4th Jan, but it has not yet arrived. I did not want to delay my requested action ( to send footage) so this email must suffice, for now.
2. The video would be useful, but it is not necessary to move this incident towards prosecution. My recorded summary of events at the time the incident was logged will serve as contemporaneous notes, and I have been keeping a log of calls etc, which will also be made available as evidence, of course, and any other evidence requested. I have retained all Whatsapps and comms associated and will keep these safely archived until requested.
3. That there was a crime cannot be doubted; an assault definitely took place. I have already compiled sufficient evidence to make prosecution a worthwhile exercise.
As the investigation widens, you can decide whether the CCTV footage is helpful, and obtain through your usual process.
4. I have cc’d my MP, which is why I have included my name and address and can confirm this is my own private email address, which I have learned is the correct direct method to make my MP aware of any issues a constituent may be having. I am hoping that her constitutional role as my MP, and knowledge of The Law, will add some democratic, as well as moral, weight to your decision to bring this case to court. I am happy to assist Police with completion of any investigations that they are unable to resource, please let me know what I can do to progress this case speedily.
5. As a Professional Engineer, I am very experienced in completing investigations into H&S incidents. I always found that, no matter how tedious the process seemed at the time, and I can assure you, where safety of workforce is concerned, these examinations can sometimes take months, and absorbed my time, which of course I always felt could be better spent on my commercial responsibilities, however, in hindsight, the value of a carefully followed process is that ALL issues are exposed. Sometimes, the cause of the incident was completely indirect, and it was only through the detailed, forensic review process that simple changes could be affected, and everyone’s safety, and perhaps lives improved. I am assuming the Police hold their own work to at least the same, or higher, standards, because your organisation has been set up to comprised of full-time, highly trained professionals. (I noted that according to the 101 voice message, all the operators are ‘highly skilled’, which bodes well for all those higher in the command chain of your organisation. I certainly hope so)
6. I am offering some additional information with regard to the background of the incident.
On Sept 10th 2021, I was detained under Section 2 of the Mental Health Act, and this may possibly be relevant to my actions.
I can confirm from my own review of the Incident that I did have ‘capacity’ to make the decision to assault the street drinker. My motivation, as recorded in my incident report was simply to suggest that he didn’t drink in the street, because his manner was incoherently threatening, and that his tendency to stand close to, and in direct eyeline of, people who were not drunk might explain the constant negative reaction that I assumed he had noticed was created wherever he went. His reply, that it was ‘my opinion’ was noted by me with him at the time to be factually correct, but I confirmed with him that I was not interested if he paid any attention to me or not, I was just pointing out a fact that he might find helpful with regard to his future conduct.
The 4 stage removal process that I employed, whereby each escalation of my actions was accompanied by a warning each time, and that the actions that would result if he failed to comply were made clear to him, to me seem reasonable at every step, but, in 2021, I was adjudged incapable of making decisions, and this right was removed from me. Can I suggest that a professional assessment by a qualified psychologist would easily determine my capacity both at the time of the interview with them, and during the 3.1.24 Incident. This factor may be used by the defence or prosecution, so if my mental capacity can be officially confirmed now, this will save time later. Certainly, once the case goes to trial, this missing element could disrupt court schedules, hence why I offer the information voluntarily. I will leave the final decision, of course, to your professional judgement as the experienced hands in court procedure.
7. Review of Police Response to date
a) 101 call. The self-selecting procedure prior to human contact felt unnecessarily intrusive. I was not concerned, merely irritated, but it seems these invitations to press various numbered keys have become so commonplace that we accept them without raising a concern. I am surprised that the Police use such a system. It is likely that callers may be emotionally raw, and feeling traumatised. The caller was sensible enough not to ring 999, but a humanising touch on answer 101 could be vital, a non-emergency could still mean life or death for them. Someone reporting historic sexual abuse or rape, for example, may have taken years to pluck up the courage to report. If you anticipate this type of vulnerable victim, and you surely do, it seems entirely unreasonable for them to do your admin tasks for you first, such as deciding whether the abuse they suffered counts as an incident, or a crime, or a road traffic accident, or a report on people breaking this week’s covid restrictions. I suggest; first pick-up by human operator and always a trained mental health professional available to the operator as a phone contact; insert into operator script to offer the service of this professional. Anyone taking up the offer is then cared for by the MH professional. At their assessment, it can be decided whether a recorded phone report is the best route for initial report, or a home visit by an Officer, or for the reporter to visit a local police station. As an end user this feels like a much more friendly system, and is likely to bring clarity to evidence, and perhaps even a little much-needed peace at a time of crisis. To me it seems fair that the person who pays for the service, the citizen, should be the first beneficiary of any system changes, which is not the impression given. You only get one chance to make a good impression, so make it a good one. I’m sure there are operational reasons of which I am not fully cognisant, because if the system was described to me as de-humanising by a ditressed vulnerable victim, I would have to agree. These are just my recommendations of course.
b) Two calls were received
bi) The first at 15:58 was to let me know that I would receive a text, which I did (this email is the response requested in the text) and to alert me to a second call.
b ii) Amanda Newlom (number not supplied i think? but may have missed, in a call from her), called me 17:33 on 3rd Jan and we agreed that, because Amanda could not confirm whether the call was, or was not, recorded, and did not have access a system that did (which surprised me) the best action was for her to raise with her manager, and arrange for me to visit a police station where my statement could be recorded.
I have had no further contact with the Police. I had anticipated that the action was mine to respond to the text, which has now been completed.
8. This is current position. I am awaiting call to go to Police station to record statement. I can be available between 10:00 and 14:00, and would prefer local please to minimse ny costs and time.
9. References and Suggested Further Reading.
A major factor in my actions leading up to the incident in 2021 was my discovery of a document, published by Dr Bernhard Willhelm Viktor Lewe (1881-1936) for his second doctorate, in 1915. The dissertation was written in German, and it has never been translated. Indeed Viktor (as he was known) Lewe is almost entirely unheard of and yet, in 1942 the PCA, Illinois, published a document: Circular Concrete Water Tanks without Prestressing (rev 1965, 1993), in which his theory, from 1915, is used as the single theoretical source for a series of co-efficient tables in the Appendices, without reference. It is illegal to issue a document into Engineering, indeed, into any discipline, without full provenance and referencing and I have alerted Journalists, Engineering Authorities, the Publisher and the Author, to no avail. Fortunately I have now been able to translate his major work, and complete details of his life and work, and this information. along with all relevant source documents is available in this public dropbox, which I have been updating over the last month or so as more details are found. Please let me know if any of it needs explaining and placing in context.
10 Potential breach of official secrets act
I am aware that the reason the PCA document does not have a reference is because Lewe’s work discloses Nuclear Weapon Theory.
In 1942, the secrecy demanded by war meant that the Manhattan Project could only remain secret if the necessary coefficient tables were issued without reference.
To still allow this state of secrecy to remain, when a smart, inquisitive man with a library card can derive how to build a Nuclear Weapon, just seems comical really
However, the true power of Lewe is the means to Psychologically corrupt and control civilian populations – see Cambridge Analytica case for data set info
This corrupted Power is the very same that Israel is using to control its own citizens to look away from the destruction of the native people of Palestine, and I allege, in Britain too, I’m afraid.
So, I think the time for secrecy is over, and perhaps, my actions in 2021 can be seen in a new light.
How many children would be alive today if your system had chosen to listen to me then, rather than today, eh?
As ever, your course of action is your choice, but be aware I will never let this drop. Every moment that passes, there is another death on someone’s conscience.
Don’t let it be yours, ok
Reynolds BEng Acts 3 22 23
07511 189746
https://drive.google.com/drive/u/0/folders/160G7LcA0wjJV1YneblOsAv1V-0AmQsPf
10. Your action: CHOOSE ACTION
(hint, choose well)
ace-consultancy.uk 